Week Two: What the “experts” Say.
Over the course of week two we have been
provided with multiple definitions of the term “Globalization” , in this my
second post whilst it might seem fairly boring I will critically analyze what
the so called “experts” think.
The first definition I’ve chosen, comes
from Albrow, (1990:45) it reads
“globalization refers to all those processes by which the people of the world
are incorporated into a single world society, global society.” When
International Relations do-gooders get together and come up with concepts such
as this, its no wonder Globalization students such as me struggle with the
concept. When Albrow states, “incorporated
into a global society” he must be having a laugh. There is no such thing as
a “global society”, each individual nation when it comes to national interest
all share only one interest, THEMSELVES.
Take the two safest Nations geographically
speaking. They are Iceland in the Northern hemisphere, and New Zealand in the
Southern. Both of these nations don’t have a serious enemy around the globe;
both are more than likely to be attacked by penguins than neighboring states.
However both have standing armies and are both joined to groups (Iceland NATO,
New Zealand ANZUS), which in the event of an attack, will come to their aid. My observation of the term “globalization” isn’t a group
of societies coming together, however more of a group economies coming
together.
Reference:
Albrow 1990:45
Google

No comments:
Post a Comment